TEOLOGI ISLAM KONTEMPORER CORAK PEMIKIRAN HARUN NASUTION DAN HM RASJIDI

Ahmad Masruri

Abstract


The aim of this research is to discuss the contemporary kalam thinking of two figures in Indonesian Islamic philosophy, Harun Nasution and HM. Rasjidi. In the history of Islamic thought, both of them are very well known among figures of Indonesian Islamic thought. This research uses qualitative research with data collection techniques, namely literature (library research) related to the theology of contemporary thought figures. The results of the research show that Harun Nasution's thinking in the concept of freedom and God's absolute will is more similar to the understanding of the Muktazilah theological school. Regarding God's justice, Harun Nasution compares and explains several schools of Islamic theology without taking sides. In understanding destiny and sunatullah, Harun emphasized the use of reason because this will influence the productive nature of the people which will have an impact on the development and progress of the Muslim community. In Harun's view, mysticism or Sufism is considered neo-Sufism. Meanwhile, HM Rasjidi is of the view that kalam science is not the same as theology. Rasyidi's view of faith is that it does not just unite humans with God, but can also be seen from the consequential dimension or human-human relationship, namely life in society

Keywords


Contemporary Theology; Harun Nasution; HM Rasjidi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdillah, Masykuri. “Penyelesaian Konflik Internal Agama.”

Al-Khodimy, Naruddin Bin Mukhtar. Kitab AlUmmah, Al-Ijtihad Al-Maqasidi, Hujjatuhu..Dawahituhu..Majalaatuhu, Juz II. 66th ed. Qatar: Menteri, n.d.

Arifin, Muhammad. Teologi Rasional Perspektif Pemikiran Harun Nasation. Banda Aceh: Lembaga Kajian Konstitusi Indonesia, 2021.

Aziz, Abd. “Melacak Signifikansi Pendidikan Multikultural Islam Di Indonesia.” Andragogi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 2, no. 3 (2020): 116–32. https://doi.org/10.36671/andragogi.v2i3.117.

Aziz, Abd, and Fatkhul Mubin. “Tafsir Tarbawī: Wacana Khalifah Dan Khilāfah Dalam Reformasi Pendidikan Islam Holistik.” Al-Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur’an 21, no. 1 (2021): 127–53. https://doi.org/10.53828/alburhan.v21i01.223.

Hamid, Muh.Abd.Halim. Buhuts Usuliah Tasyari’yah Silsilahnahwa Al-Nur. Kairo: Dar al-Tauzi’ wa al-Nasr Islamiah, 1991.

Ibrahim. “AJARAN ISLAM DALAM PANDANGAN HARUN NASUTION.” Jurnal Aqidah-Ta 5, no. 2 (2019): 131–42.

Irfan, Muhammad. “Paradigma Islam Rasional Harun Nasution : Membumikan Teologi Kerukunan.” JISA: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosiologi Agama 1, no. 2 (2018).

Nasution, Harun. Islam Rasional, Gagasan Dan Pemikiran, Ed. by Saiful Muzani, IV. Bandung: Mizan, 1996.

———. Teologi Islam: Aliran-Aliran Sejarah Analisis Perbandingan. Jakarta: UI Publishing, 2020.

Rahma, Andi Rika Nur, and Hanan Assagaf. “TEOLOGI ISLAM HARUN NASUTION.” Jurnal Aqidah-Ta VIII, no. 2 (2022): 128–49.

Rasjidi, H.M. Koreksi Terhadap Dr. Harun Nasution, Tentang” Islam Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Aspeknya “. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1977.

Rasyidi, H.M. Islam Dan Kebatinan. Jakarta: Yayasan Islam Studi Club Indonesia, 1967.

———. Sekulerisasi Dalam Persoalan Lagi, Suatu Koreksi Atas Tulisan Drs. Nurcholish Madjid Tentang Sekulerisasi. Jakarta: Yayasan Bangkit, 1972.

Saputri, Liva. Kehendak Mutlak Tuhan Dan Kebebasan Manusia Studi Perbandingan Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman Dan Harun Nasution’. Bukittinggi: Institut Agama Islam Negeri, 2021.

Sariah, Sariah. “Tinjauan Tentang Hubungan Tentang Kehendak Tuhan Dengan Keadilan Tuhan.” Toleransi 1, no. 1 (2009): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.24014/trs.v1i1.442.

Suprayogo, Imam. “Persoalan Berat Yang Dihadapi Oleh Umat Islam’, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang,” 2016.

Syam, Syamsuar. “Perbuatan Manusia Perspektif Aliran Kalam Dan Ethos Kerja ( Kajian Tentang Manfaat Teologi Rasional Dalam Manajemen Diri ).” Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 2018, 31–45.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36671/mumtaz.v7i01.591

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Masruri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.